🏛️ The Three Pillars of Democracy
How India's Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary Work Together to Run the Country
📚 Understanding Democracy: More Than Just Elections
Democracy is often thought of as just voting and electing leaders. But that's only the beginning! In a real democracy, rulers must follow specific rules and work within established institutions. These institutions ensure that government decisions are orderly, responsible, and continuous—even when leaders change.
Think of a democracy like a school management system. The principal, teachers, and students all play different roles. If only the principal made all decisions without listening to anyone, it wouldn't be a good system. Similarly, in a country, we need different institutions to keep the system balanced.
🎯 The Three Main Institutions
Legislature
Parliament
Makes laws for the country
Executive
PM & Cabinet
Implements the laws
Judiciary
Supreme Court
Resolves disputes
📰 Real-World Example: The Mandal Commission & Reservations
Let's look at a real example from August 13, 1990, to understand how these institutions work together. This is the famous Office Memorandum that introduced the 27% job reservation for backward classes in India.
🔄 The Decision-Making Journey
The Government appointed the Mandal Commission to study backward classes and recommend improvements.
The Commission recommended 27% job reservation for backward classes.
The report was discussed in Parliament. Many MPs and political parties demanded action on these recommendations.
The Janata Dal party promised in their election manifesto to implement the Mandal recommendations if they came to power.
The Union Cabinet formally decided to implement the recommendations. PM V.P. Singh announced this in Parliament the next day.
A Joint Secretary in the Department of Personnel signed the Office Memorandum, making it official.
The Supreme Court upheld the order as valid but asked for modifications to exclude well-off backward class members.
The government issued a new order with the Court's modifications, ending the dispute.
😤 Why This Decision Was So Controversial
The reservation policy led to massive debates across India. Different groups had very different views:
✅ Those Who Supported It
- Believed it would correct historical discrimination
- Felt backward classes deserved equal opportunities
- Supported more representation in government jobs
❌ Those Who Opposed It
- Argued it denied equality to non-reserved groups
- Worried it would perpetuate caste consciousness
- Believed merit should be the only criterion
📌 Did You Know?
This decision was so important that even advertising companies like Amul used it as a theme! It was one of the biggest political debates of 1990-91. Newspapers and magazines discussed it every day. This shows how major government decisions affect the whole country.
🏛️ Institution #1: The Legislature (Parliament)
Parliament is the assembly of elected representatives of the people. It's the most powerful institution because it directly represents the will of the people through elections.
What Does Parliament Do?
📊 The Two Houses of Parliament
💡 Why Parliament Matters in the Mandal Case
In our example, Parliament didn't directly take the reservation decision. But it was crucial! For years, MPs debated the Mandal Commission report. They pressured the government to act. The President even announced the implementation plan in Parliament. Without Parliament's support, the PM couldn't have gone ahead with the order. This shows how Parliament indirectly shapes major decisions.
⚙️ Institution #2: The Executive (Implementation Power)
While Parliament makes the laws, the Executive implements them. It's like Parliament is the architect who designs a building, and the Executive is the construction team that builds it.
Two Types of Executive
🎤 Political Executive
- Who: Prime Minister, Ministers, Cabinet
- Elected: Yes, by the people
- Term: Fixed period (usually 5 years)
- Role: Take major policy decisions
- Answerable to: Parliament & People
👔 Permanent Executive
- Who: Civil servants, officers, bureaucrats
- Appointed: Yes, through exams
- Term: Long-term, stable employment
- Role: Implement decisions & advise ministers
- Continue: Even when government changes
🤔 Why Does the Minister Have More Power Than the Expert?
The Question: The Finance Minister might not know economics as well as the civil servants in the Finance Ministry. So why does the minister make the final decision?
The Answer: Because in democracy, the people are supreme! The minister is elected by the people (indirectly through Parliament) and is answerable to them. When something goes wrong, people blame the minister, not the expert. That's why the minister decides!
Good Analogy: Think of it like a school. The Principal might not be the best teacher, but the Principal decides what happens because they're responsible to the parents and the education board. Teachers advise, but the Principal decides.
👑 The Prime Minister
Most Powerful Person in the Executive
Not directly elected - The President appoints the leader of the majority party in Lok Sabha as PM.
Powers:
- Chairs all Cabinet meetings
- Coordinates all departments
- Can dismiss ministers
- Makes final decisions in disagreements
- When PM quits, the entire government quits
Constraint: The PM must have the support of the majority in Lok Sabha. If he loses this support, he must resign!
🏢 The Cabinet & Council of Ministers
The Executive includes 60-80 ministers of different ranks:
Top leaders running major ministries. ~25 members who meet regularly to take decisions.
In charge of smaller ministries. Attend Cabinet meetings when specially invited.
Assist Cabinet Ministers. Don't attend regular Cabinet meetings.
📌 In the Mandal Case
The Joint Secretary who signed the order was from the Permanent Executive. But he didn't decide to give reservations—he was just following orders! The Minister (Political Executive) told him what to write. The Cabinet made the decision. The PM informed Parliament. This shows the hierarchy clearly.
⚖️ Institution #3: The Judiciary (Guardian of Justice)
The Judiciary's job is to settle disputes and make sure the government follows the Constitution. It's like a referee in a game—making sure everyone plays by the rules.
Structure of Indian Judiciary
The Integrated Judicial System
The Supreme Court controls all courts below it. Its decisions are binding on everyone.
🎯 Powers of the Supreme Court
⭐ Independence of the Judiciary
For the Judiciary to work fairly, it must be independent. This means it's not controlled by the Legislature or Executive. Here's how independence is protected:
📌 In the Mandal Case: Judicial Review in Action
Many people filed cases in court challenging the reservation order. The Supreme Court took up all these cases together as "Indira Sawhney and others Vs Union of India." Eleven judges heard arguments from both sides. The Court had several options:
- Completely reject the government order
- Completely support the government order
- Support it but ask for modifications
What Did They Decide? The Court declared the order VALID (supporting the government), BUT it also asked the government to modify it by excluding well-to-do backward class members. The government followed this advice and issued a new order in 1993.
Why This Matters: This shows the Supreme Court isn't just blindly supporting or opposing the government. It reviews decisions, maintains balance, and protects public interest. That's what an independent Judiciary does!
🤝 How All Three Institutions Work Together
The three institutions don't work in isolation. They work together with checks and balances:
The System of Checks & Balances
🏛️ Parliament (Legislature)
Checks on Executive: Can pass laws that the government must follow. Can remove the PM if it loses confidence. Controls government money.
Checks on Judiciary: Can amend the Constitution (but not the basic structure). Can impeach judges (though it hasn't happened).
⚙️ Executive
Checks on Parliament: PM advises President to dissolve Parliament and hold new elections if there's political crisis.
Checks on Judiciary: Appoints judges (on advice of senior judges—very limited power).
⚖️ Judiciary
Checks on Legislature: Can declare laws invalid if they violate Constitution.
Checks on Executive: Can declare government actions invalid. Can order government to do something. Reviews administrative decisions.
💡 Why Institutions Are Essential (Even If They Seem Slow)
You might think institutions are frustrating. They involve meetings, committees, forms, procedures—everything takes time. Why not just let the PM decide everything quickly?
❌ Without Institutions (Dictatorship)
Advantage: Fast decisions
Disadvantages:
- Bad decisions can be made quickly
- No one checks if decision is fair
- Power gets concentrated
- People have no say
✅ With Institutions (Democracy)
Advantage: Better, fairer decisions
- Many people get to have a say
- Bad ideas get filtered out
- Decisions are reviewed and checked
- Power is distributed
Disadvantage: Takes more time
🏗️ Think of It This Way
Building a house with one person making all decisions? Fast but may collapse! Building with an architect, engineer, supervisor, and quality checker? Slower, but the house lasts. Democracy is like the second option—slower but better!
🌍 India's System vs Other Countries
📋 Quick Summary: What You Should Remember
Lok Sabha + Rajya Sabha + President. Most powerful institution because it represents the people directly through elections.
PM + Cabinet + Civil Servants. Political executive decides, permanent executive executes. Must have Parliament support.
Supreme Court + High Courts. Independent, powerful, reviews all laws and government actions. Guardian of Constitution.
All three institutions check each other. No single person can become too powerful. Prevents dictatorship.
Slow but fair. Involves many people. Better decisions. More accountability. This is what makes India truly democratic!
All power ultimately comes from people. Elections, Parliament, Constitution—everything is based on people's will.
🎯 Test Your Understanding
Question 1: Which institution makes laws in India?
B) President
C) Parliament
D) Supreme Court
Answer: C) Parliament - Only Parliament can make, change, or abolish laws.
Question 2: Can the Prime Minister do whatever he wants?
B) No, he needs Parliament's support
C) No, he needs Supreme Court approval
D) Yes, because he's elected
Answer: B) No, he needs Parliament's support - If Parliament loses confidence, PM must resign.
Question 3: What is Judicial Review?
B) Courts declaring laws/actions invalid if unconstitutional
C) Parliament reviewing court decisions
D) President reviewing laws
Answer: B) - Judicial Review is the Supreme Court's power to declare laws or government actions unconstitutional.
Question 4: Why are institutions important in democracy?
B) Because they concentrate power
C) Because they check each other and prevent dictatorship
D) Because they reduce people's participation
Answer: C) - Institutions create checks and balances, preventing any single person from becoming too powerful.
💭 Think About These Real Situations
Scenario 1: What if the Supreme Court had not existed?
When thousands of people protested against the reservation order, there was no court to settle the dispute. The government could have ignored the protesters and nobody could have stopped them. See how important independent courts are?
Scenario 2: What if Parliament had not discussed the Mandal Report?
If there was no Parliamentary discussion, the government might have forced the reservation order without people knowing about it. Parliamentary debates created pressure and made the decision legitimate in people's eyes.
Scenario 3: What if the PM could make laws directly?
The PM might make laws that benefit only his party. Without Parliament's check, people could lose fundamental rights. This is why Parliament's power to make laws is given only to elected representatives, not appointed PM.
Scenario 4: What if civil servants decided government policy?
Civil servants are experts but not elected. If they decided policy, people would have no say in decisions affecting their lives. That's why the elected minister, who answers to people, makes final decisions.
🎓 Final Thoughts: Why This Matters to You
Understanding how institutions work isn't just for history exams. It's about understanding your own rights and responsibilities as a citizen of India.
The Mandal case shows how one policy decision involved everyone—from the people in 1980 demanding justice, to Parliament discussing it, to the PM making a decision, to courts ensuring fairness. That's democracy in action. And you're part of this system!
Tip: Click the button above and select "Save as PDF" to practice offline.
