- This question paper contains four sections. Read all instructions carefully before attempting.
- Section A consists of 20 Multiple Choice Questions of 1 mark each. Choose the most appropriate option.
- Section B consists of 8 Short Answer Questions of 3 marks each. Answer in 40–60 words.
- Section C consists of 4 Long Answer Questions of 5 marks each. Answer in 100–120 words.
- Section D consists of 2 Case Studies with 2 questions each (4 marks per case). Read each passage carefully.
- All questions are compulsory unless an internal choice is given.
- Write neat, legible answers. Diagrams and tables should be labelled.
Choose the most appropriate answer from the four options given below each question.
Per Capita Income (average income) is the most common method used by the World Bank to compare the development of countries.
The World Bank classifies countries with per capita income ≥ US$ 63,400 per annum (2023) as high-income or rich countries.
India’s per capita income in 2023 was approximately US$ 10,030 per annum, placing it in the low middle-income category.
Bihar had a per capita income of ₹47,498 in 2021–22, the lowest among the three. Haryana was highest at ₹2,64,729.
The Human Development Index (HDI) is published annually by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in its Human Development Report.
Kerala has an IMR of just 6 per 1,000 live births (2020), far better than Haryana (28) or Bihar (27) — due to strong public health facilities.
Crude oil is a non-renewable resource with a fixed stock that cannot be replenished. Global reserves at current extraction rates will last about 47 years.
HDI combines health (life expectancy), education (mean years of schooling), and income (GNI per capita). Military strength is not a component.
India ranks 134th out of 193 countries in the HDI (2021–22), behind Sri Lanka (78) and Bangladesh (129).
Sri Lanka ranks 78th on HDI — the highest among India’s listed neighbours. Pakistan ranks lowest at 164th.
This famous quote captures the essence of sustainable development — present generations must not exhaust resources needed by future generations.
IMR = number of children dying before completing one year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births in that year.
Per capita income = Total national income ÷ total population. It represents the average income per person in a country.
Beyond income, people seek equal treatment, freedom, security, and respect — these are vital non-material developmental goals.
Kerala’s well-functioning PDS ensures access to subsidised food, improving nutrition and health — a key reason for its exceptionally low IMR of 6.
According to the NCERT text, groundwater overuse is particularly found in agriculturally prosperous Punjab and Western UP, hard rock plateaus, and coastal areas.
Two countries can have the same average income but very different distributions — e.g. Country A (equal) vs Country B (one rich, rest poor).
PPP adjusts income so that every dollar buys the same amount of goods and services in any country, enabling fair cross-country comparison.
Life situations differ — a tribal may oppose a dam that benefits an industrialist. What is development for one may be destruction for another.
Literacy Rate = proportion of literate population in the 7-and-above age group. It is a key educational indicator used in development comparisons.
Answer each question in approximately 40–60 words.
- Example 1: A landless rural labourer wants more days of work and better wages; a prosperous Punjab farmer wants high crop support prices and cheap labour.
- Example 2: An industrialist wants dams to generate cheap electricity; a tribal living near the river resists the dam as it submerges their land.
- Total Income = sum of incomes of all residents of a country.
- Per Capita Income = Total income ÷ Total population. It is also called average income.
- Why better: Countries have different population sizes. Comparing total incomes would not reveal what an average person earns. Per capita income makes the comparison meaningful — it tells us how much a typical individual earns, allowing fairer cross-country comparisons.
- Infant Mortality Rate: Haryana 28 vs Kerala 6 (per 1,000 live births, 2020). Kerala is far superior.
- Literacy Rate: Haryana 82% vs Kerala 94% (2017–18). Kerala is superior.
- Conclusion: Although Haryana has a higher per capita income than Kerala, Kerala performs better on human development indicators because of its superior public facilities — healthcare, education, and the PDS. This proves that income alone is not an adequate measure of development.
- Importance: Money in your pocket cannot buy everything — a pollution-free environment, prevention of infectious diseases, or universal education require collective provision. Individual provision is costly and unequal; collective provision is cheaper and fairer.
- Example 1: Government schools — enable children from all classes to study.
- Example 2: Public Distribution System (PDS) — provides subsidised food, improving health and nutrition for all.
- Renewable Resources: Resources that are naturally replenished over time. However, they can be over-exploited if used faster than nature replenishes them. Example: Groundwater — replenished by rain, but about 300 districts in India have seen water levels fall over 4 metres in 20 years due to overuse.
- Non-Renewable Resources: Resources with a fixed stock on Earth that cannot be replenished once used. Example: Crude oil — estimated global reserves will last only about 47 years at current extraction rates.
| Basis | World Bank | UNDP (HDI) |
|---|---|---|
| Criterion | Per capita income only | Income + Health + Education |
| Focus | Economic output | Human wellbeing |
| Limitation | Hides inequality & quality of life | More comprehensive picture |
- Importance 1: Overuse of renewable resources (e.g. groundwater in Punjab) and depletion of non-renewables (crude oil lasting ~47 years) threatens future availability.
- Importance 2: Environmental degradation crosses national boundaries — our future is linked together globally. Without sustainable practices, economic growth today destroys tomorrow’s potential.
- National Development means choosing goals and policies that benefit the largest number of people in a fair and just manner — thinking about what is good for the whole nation, not just a group or individual.
- Difference from individual goals: Individual goals can be personal (a rich farmer wanting cheap labour) or even harmful to others (a factory wanting to dump waste). National development must weigh all perspectives and choose paths where the benefit is widespread and equitable.
- It also involves asking: Would this idea benefit a large number or only a small group? Is it fair?
Answer each question in approximately 100–120 words. Internal choice is provided.
- Non-material goals: People also seek equal treatment, freedom, security, and respect. These cannot be bought with money but are vital to wellbeing. A job offering high pay but no security or family time reduces quality of life.
- Collective goods: A pollution-free environment, prevention of infectious disease, and quality education require collective social action — individual money cannot guarantee them.
- Kerala–Haryana example: Despite Haryana’s higher per capita income, Kerala has far lower Infant Mortality Rate (6 vs 28), higher literacy (94% vs 82%) and better school attendance — because Kerala invests in public facilities.
- Women’s dignity: If women engage in paid work, their dignity in the household increases. But if society provides respect and safety, women can pursue any career — showing that non-material conditions shape economic outcomes.
- Average Income Trap: While averages are useful for comparison, they hide disparities. Two countries can have the same average income, yet one may be far more unequal.
- Example (Country A vs B): Country A has 5 citizens earning ₹9,500; ₹10,500; ₹9,800; ₹10,000; ₹10,200 — average ₹10,000. Country B has 4 citizens earning ₹500 each and one earning ₹48,000 — also average ₹10,000. Though the average is identical, most people in Country B are poor. Country A has equitable distribution; Country B is highly unequal.
- Why equitable distribution matters:
- High average income with extreme inequality means most citizens are poor while few are very rich.
- Access to food, education, healthcare, and dignity depends on how income is distributed, not just its average.
- A society where everyone earns similarly (Country A) is more developed in a meaningful human sense than one with extreme concentration of wealth (Country B).
- 1. Health: Measured by Life Expectancy at birth — the average expected length of life at birth.
- 2. Education: Measured by mean years of schooling of people aged 25 and above.
- 3. Income: Measured by GNI per capita in 2017 PPP dollars, which adjusts for purchasing power.
- Sri Lanka: GNI $11,899, Life Exp. 76.6 yrs, Schooling 11.2 yrs → HDI Rank 78 (best)
- Bangladesh: GNI $6,511, Life Exp. 73.7 yrs → Rank 129
- India: GNI $6,951, Life Exp. 67.7 yrs → Rank 134
- Nepal: GNI $4,026, Life Exp. 70.5 yrs → Rank 146
- Pakistan: GNI $5,374, Life Exp. 66.4 yrs → Rank 164 (worst)
- Example 1 — Groundwater Crisis (India): About 300 districts have reported a water level decline of over 4 metres in 20 years. Nearly one-third of the country already overuses its groundwater reserves. At this rate, 60% of India will be overusing groundwater in 25 years. Agriculturally prosperous regions like Punjab and Western UP are worst affected.
- Example 2 — Crude Oil Depletion (World): Global crude oil reserves (1,732 thousand million barrels) will last only about 47 years at current extraction rates. The US has only 10.5 years of reserves, while the Middle East has about 70 years. Countries like India that depend on oil imports face severe energy vulnerability.
- Implication of the quote: “We have borrowed the Earth from our children” means future generations have a right to the same natural resources we enjoy today. We are not owners — we are temporary custodians. Destroying resources for short-term gain violates the rights of those yet to be born.
- Landless rural labourers: Want more days of work, better wages, quality schools for children, and no social discrimination — basic survival and dignity.
- Prosperous Punjab farmers: Want high crop support prices, cheap labour, and ability to settle children abroad — maximising wealth and opportunity.
- Girl from rich urban family: Wants the same freedom as her brother, the right to choose her career, and study abroad — equality and autonomy.
- Adivasis near Narmada valley: Want protection of their land and forest rights, not large dams — security and culture over industrial progress.
- Conflicting goals: Industrialists need large dams for cheap electricity (their development). But the same dam submerges tribal land and destroys livelihoods (destruction for tribals). This is why what is development for one can be destruction for another.
Read the passages and data carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Study the following data from Table 1.4 and Table 1.3 of NCERT Chapter 1: Development, and answer the questions below.
| State | Per Capita Income (2021–22 in ₹) | IMR per 1,000 live births (2020) | Literacy Rate % (2017–18) | Net Attendance Ratio — secondary (2017–18) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haryana | 2,64,729 | 28 | 82 | 73 |
| Kerala | 2,34,405 | 6 | 94 | 94 |
| Bihar | 47,498 | 27 | 62 | 69 |
- Per Capita Income: Haryana (₹2,64,729) > Kerala (₹2,34,405) — Haryana wins.
- IMR: Haryana 28 vs Kerala 6 — Kerala is dramatically better (28 children die per 1,000 in Haryana vs only 6 in Kerala).
- Literacy Rate: Haryana 82% vs Kerala 94% — Kerala is better.
- Net Attendance Ratio: Haryana 73% vs Kerala 94% — Kerala is better.
- About one-third of children aged 15–17 in Bihar do not attend secondary school — creating a large pool of unskilled youth.
- Low literacy perpetuates the cycle of poverty: uneducated parents cannot support children’s education, keeping future generations trapped.
- Low-skilled workforce reduces Bihar’s productive capacity, limits innovation, and deters investment — reducing future per capita income growth.
- Constitutional goal of free and compulsory education for all children up to 14 years (expected by 1960) remains unfulfilled.
- Open more schools, especially in rural areas and for girls, who are disproportionately excluded.
- Strengthen the Mid-Day Meal scheme to incentivise attendance.
- Improve teacher quality and accountability.
- Launch conditional cash transfers to families who keep children in school.
- Invest in healthcare (reducing IMR of 27 close to Kerala’s 6) through public hospitals and PDS.
Read the following passage adapted from NCERT Class 10 Economics, Chapter 1, and answer the questions that follow:
“Recent evidence suggests that the groundwater is under serious threat of overuse in many parts of the country. About 300 districts have reported a water level decline of over 4 metres during the past 20 years. Nearly one-third of the country is overusing their groundwater reserves. In another 25 years, 60 per cent of the country would be doing the same if the present way of using this resource continues. Groundwater overuse is particularly found in the agriculturally prosperous regions of Punjab and Western U.P., hard rock plateau areas of central and south India, some coastal areas and the rapidly growing urban settlements.”
Additionally, global crude oil reserves are estimated at 1,732 thousand million barrels. At the current rate of extraction, they will last only about 47 years. Countries like India depend heavily on oil imports.
- Why renewable: Groundwater is a renewable resource because it is naturally replenished by rainfall through the process of percolation and seepage into the water table.
- Why still under threat: Renewable does not mean unlimited. If the rate of consumption exceeds the rate of replenishment, even a renewable resource gets depleted. In India, agricultural demand (especially for water-intensive crops in Punjab and Western UP), industrial use, and rapid urbanisation have caused extraction to far outpace recharge.
- Scale of threat: 300 districts have seen water levels fall 4+ metres. One-third of the country is already overusing reserves. If unchecked, 60% will face crisis in 25 years.
- Lesson: Renewable resources can sustain us only if used within their regeneration capacity. Overuse converts a renewable resource into a functionally non-renewable one. This is central to the concept of sustainable development — protecting resources so they remain available for future generations.
- India imports most of its crude oil — as global reserves shrink, prices will rise sharply, making energy more expensive for every citizen and industry.
- Oil price increases create inflationary pressure across the economy (transport, food, manufacturing all become costlier).
- Over-dependence on oil-rich nations (Middle East) creates geopolitical vulnerability — supply disruptions directly threaten India’s energy security.
- India’s foreign exchange reserves are strained by high oil import bills, limiting funds available for other development priorities.
- Solar energy: India has immense solar potential (especially in Rajasthan, Gujarat). The National Solar Mission aims to make India a global solar energy leader. Solar is renewable, clean, and increasingly cost-competitive.
- Wind energy: India has a large coastline and high wind-potential states (Tamil Nadu, Gujarat). Wind farms can generate large amounts of electricity without fossil fuels, reducing oil dependence for power generation.
| Section | Type | No. of Qs | Marks Each | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | MCQ | 20 | 1 | 20 |
| B | Short Answer | 8 | 3 | 24 |
| C | Long Answer | 4 (with 1 internal choice) | 5 | 20 |
| D | Case Study | 4 | 4 | 16 |
| Grand Total | 80 | |||
1 mark Example 1: Landless labourer (wants wages/work) vs prosperous farmer (wants high prices/cheap labour).
1 mark Example 2: Industrialist (wants dam for electricity) vs tribal (dam destroys their land).
1 mark Per capita income = total income ÷ total population (also called average income).
1 mark Per capita income is better because different countries have different populations; total income does not tell us individual earnings.
1 mark Literacy Rate: Haryana 82% vs Kerala 94% — Kerala superior.
1 mark Conclusion: Higher income alone does not ensure better development; public facilities matter more.
1 mark Important because individual money cannot buy pollution-free air, epidemic prevention, or universal education.
1 mark Examples: Government schools + PDS (any two valid examples).
1 mark Non-renewable = fixed stock, cannot be replenished (crude oil).
1 mark Key distinction: renewal capacity — oil lasts ~47 years globally.
1 mark HDI uses income + health (life expectancy) + education (schooling) — three dimensions.
1 mark Key difference: HDI focuses on human wellbeing, not just economic output.
1 mark Importance 1: Resources (groundwater, oil) are finite or can be over-exploited.
1 mark Importance 2: Environmental degradation is global and intergenerational.
1 mark Individual goals can be personal/selfish or harmful to others.
1 mark National development must weigh all perspectives and choose broad-based, equitable paths.
- Income enables purchasing power (1 mark)
- Non-material goals: freedom, security, equal treatment, respect (1 mark)
- Collective goods argument (pollution-free env., disease prevention) (1 mark)
- Kerala vs Haryana: higher income but worse IMR/literacy in Haryana (1 mark)
- Conclusion: Development = mix of income + non-material goals (1 mark)
- Averages hide disparities (1 mark)
- Country A vs B example with correct data (2 marks)
- Why equitable distribution matters — access to food, healthcare, dignity (1 mark)
- Conclusion: Size + distribution of income both matter (1 mark)
- HDI definition: UNDP composite index (1 mark)
- Component 1: Health — Life Expectancy at birth (1 mark)
- Component 2: Education — Mean years of schooling (1 mark)
- Component 3: Income — GNI per capita in PPP dollars (1 mark)
- India rank 134; Sri Lanka 78 (best); Pakistan 164 (worst); Bangladesh 129 ahead of India despite lower income (1 mark)
- Definition: present needs without compromising future generations (1 mark)
- Example 1: Groundwater — 300 districts, 4m decline, 60% crisis in 25 yrs (1 mark)
- Example 2: Crude oil — 1,732 bn barrels, ~47 years remaining (1 mark)
- Quote implication: future generations have equal rights to resources (1 mark)
- Overall analysis: sustainability as a core development principle (1 mark)
- Reason: different life situations (1 mark)
- Category 1 with goal: Landless labourer — work, wages, schools (1 mark)
- Category 2 with goal: Girl from rich family — freedom, equality (1 mark)
- Category 3 with goal: Adivasi / tribal — land rights, cultural protection (1 mark)
- Conflicting goals example (dam) + conclusion (fair national development) (1 mark)
- Correct comparison of all 4 indicators with data (1 mark)
- Identifying PDS + public healthcare as key reason (1 mark)
- Explanation: money alone cannot buy collective public goods (1 mark)
- Conclusion: income is necessary but not sufficient for human development (1 mark)
- Consequence 1: unskilled workforce, poverty trap (1 mark)
- Consequence 2: constitutional goal of free education unfulfilled (1 mark)
- Govt role 1: open more schools especially for girls (1 mark)
- Govt role 2: strengthen PDS / Mid-Day Meal / incentive schemes (1 mark)
- Renewable because replenished by rainfall (1 mark)
- Threatened because extraction rate > replenishment rate (1 mark)
- Data from passage: 300 districts, 60% crisis in 25 yrs (1 mark)
- Lesson: renewable ≠ unlimited; sustainability requires staying within regeneration limits (1 mark)
- Challenge 1: India imports oil — rising prices strain economy and foreign exchange (1 mark)
- Challenge 2: geopolitical vulnerability / energy insecurity (1 mark)
- Alternative 1: Solar energy — India’s National Solar Mission; renewable & clean (1 mark)
- Alternative 2: Wind energy — large coastline; Tamil Nadu & Gujarat potential (1 mark)