Student Mathematics Blog · Grade 10
Mastering Pairs of Linear Equations in Two Variables
Pair of Linear Equations Overview: To solve a pair of linear equations in two variables, first compare coefficient ratios (a₁/a₂, b₁/b₂, c₁/c₂). This determines if lines intersect (consistent), coincide (infinite solutions), or are parallel (no solution).
A professor-guided walkthrough with 15 progressively challenging problems across every method — graphical, substitution, and elimination.

Professor's Commentary: Before you ever pick up a pencil to draw a graph, check the ratios of coefficients. This simple comparison tells you the "destiny" of the two lines — whether they will intersect (one unique answer), coincide (infinite answers), or run parallel forever (no answer). Master this diagnostic step, and you will save yourself enormous effort.

Step 1Identify the coefficients from the general form a₁x + b₁y + c₁ = 0:
Eq. 1: a₁=1, b₁=-2, c₁=0 | Eq. 2: a₂=3, b₂=4, c₂=-20
Step 2Compare the coefficient ratios:
a₁/a₂ = 1/3 and b₁/b₂ = -2/4 = -1/2
Since
1/3 ≠ -1/2, the lines must intersect — the system is
consistent with a unique solution.
Step 3Build a two-point table for each line:
Eq. 1 (y = x/2): (0, 0) and (4, 2)
Eq. 2 (y = (20-3x)/4): (0, 5) and (4, 2)
Step 4Plot both lines. They share the point (4, 2) — this is the unique intersection.
Verification ✓
Plug (4, 2) into both equations:
Eq. 1: 4 - 2(2) = 4 - 4 = 0 ✓
Eq. 2: 3(4) + 4(2) - 20 = 12 + 8 - 20 = 0 ✓
Answer
Consistent. Unique solution: x = 4, y = 2
Step 1Extract coefficients: a₁=5, b₁=-4 / a₂=7, b₂=6
Step 2Compare ratios:
a₁/a₂ = 5/7 and b₁/b₂ = -4/6 = -2/3
Step 3Since 5/7 ≠ -2/3, the ratios differ → the lines intersect.
Answer
Intersecting lines — consistent (unique solution).
Step 1Let length =
x, width =
y. Translate the conditions:
Condition 1: x = y + 4 → x - y = 4
Condition 2: x + y = 36
Step 2Check ratios: a₁/a₂ = 1/1 = 1, b₁/b₂ = -1/1 = -1. Since 1 ≠ -1 → intersecting, consistent.
Step 3Two points for each line:
x - y = 4: (4, 0) and (0, -4)
x + y = 36: (0, 36) and (20, 16)
Step 4The lines cross at (20, 16).
Answer
Length = 20 m, Width = 16 m.
Step 1Identify: a₁=1, b₁=2, c₁=-4 / a₂=2, b₂=4, c₂=-12
Step 2Compute all three ratios:
a₁/a₂ = 1/2
b₁/b₂ = 2/4 = 1/2
c₁/c₂ = -4/-12 = 1/3
Step 3We find a₁/a₂ = b₁/b₂ ≠ c₁/c₂, i.e., 1/2 = 1/2 ≠ 1/3. This is the parallel condition — the lines never meet.
Answer
No solution — the rails are parallel and will never cross.
Step 1Let pencil cost =
x (₹), pen cost =
y (₹).
Equation 1: 5x + 7y = 50
Equation 2: 7x + 5y = 46
Step 2Check ratios: a₁/a₂ = 5/7, b₁/b₂ = 7/5. Since 5/7 ≠ 7/5 → consistent, intersecting.
Step 3Two points per line:
Eq. 1: (10, 0) and (3, 5)
Eq. 2: (8, -2) and (3, 5)
Step 4Both lines pass through (3, 5). Check: 5(3)+7(5)=15+35=50 ✓ and 7(3)+5(5)=21+25=46 ✓
Answer
Pencil = ₹ 3, Pen = ₹ 5.

Professor's Insight: When solutions involve messy non-integer coordinates like 49/29 or -1.75, graphs become unreliable. That's where substitution excels — it is algebraically exact. The logic is simple: Isolate → Substitute → Solve → Back-substitute.
Step 1Isolate
x from the simpler Equation 2:
x - y = 4 → x = y + 4 ... (3)
Step 2Substitute (3) into Equation 1:
(y + 4) + y = 14
2y + 4 = 14
2y = 10
y = 5
Step 3Back-substitute y=5 into (3): x = 5 + 4 = 9
Verification ✓
Eq. 1: 9 + 5 = 14 ✓ | Eq. 2: 9 - 5 = 4 ✓
Answer
x = 9, y = 5
Step 1Clear decimals — multiply both equations by 10:
2x + 3y = 13 ... (1)
4x + 5y = 23 ... (2)
Step 2Isolate
x from (1):
x = (13 - 3y) / 2 ... (3)
Step 3Substitute (3) into (2):
4 × (13 - 3y)/2 + 5y = 23
2(13 - 3y) + 5y = 23
26 - 6y + 5y = 23
-y = -3 → y = 3
Step 4Back-substitute: x = (13 - 9)/2 = 4/2 = 2
Answer
x = 2, y = 3
Step 1Define variables: Aftab's age =
a, daughter's age =
d. Translate conditions:
Seven years ago: a - 7 = 7(d - 7) → a - 7d + 42 = 0 ... (1)
Three years hence: a + 3 = 3(d + 3) → a - 3d - 6 = 0 ... (2)
Step 2Isolate
a from Equation (2):
a = 3d + 6 ... (3)
Step 3Substitute (3) into (1):
(3d + 6) - 7d + 42 = 0
-4d + 48 = 0
4d = 48
d = 12
Step 4Back-substitute: a = 3(12) + 6 = 42
Answer
Aftab = 42 years, Daughter = 12 years.
Step 1Let numerator =
x, denominator =
y. Set up equations by cross-multiplying:
(x+2)/(y+2) = 9/11 → 11x + 22 = 9y + 18 → 11x - 9y + 4 = 0 ... (1)
(x+3)/(y+3) = 5/6 → 6x + 18 = 5y + 15 → 6x - 5y + 3 = 0 ... (2)
Step 2Isolate
x from (1):
x = (9y - 4) / 11 ... (3)
Step 3Substitute into (2):
6(9y - 4)/11 - 5y = -3
(54y - 24)/11 - 5y = -3
54y - 24 - 55y = -33
-y = -9 → y = 9
Step 4Back-substitute: x = (81 - 4)/11 = 77/11 = 7
Answer
The fraction is 7/9.
Step 1Isolate
x from the simpler Equation 2:
x = 3 - 2y ... (3)
Step 2Substitute into Equation 1:
7(3 - 2y) - 15y = 2
21 - 14y - 15y = 2
21 - 29y = 2
-29y = 2 - 21 = -19
y = 19/29
Step 3Back-substitute:
x = 3 - 2(19/29)
x = 3 - 38/29
x = 87/29 - 38/29
x = 49/29
Step 4This is exactly why the graphical method would fail here — 49/29 ≈ 1.69 is nearly impossible to read off a graph accurately.
Answer
x = 49/29, y = 19/29. A non-integer solution — only algebra can find this reliably.

Professor's Commentary: I find elimination particularly elegant. Rather than isolating a variable, you neutralize it — multiply the equations by well-chosen constants, then add or subtract to make one variable vanish. It is especially powerful when both equations have large coefficients, where substitution becomes algebraically messy.
Step 1Multiply Equation 1 by 3 to match the y-coefficient:
3(x + y) = 3(5) → 3x + 3y = 15 ... (3)
Keep Eq. 2: 2x - 3y = 4 ... (2)
Step 2Add (3) and (2) — the
y terms cancel:
(3x + 3y) + (2x - 3y) = 15 + 4
5x = 19
x = 19/5 = 3.8
Step 3Substitute
x=3.8 into Equation 1:
3.8 + y = 5 → y = 1.2
Verification ✓
Eq. 1: 3.8 + 1.2 = 5 ✓
Eq. 2: 2(3.8) - 3(1.2) = 7.6 - 3.6 = 4 ✓
Answer
x = 3.8, y = 1.2
Step 1Multiply Equation 1 by 2 to match x-coefficients:
4x + 6y = 16 ... (3)
4x + 6y = 7 ... (2)
Step 2Subtract (2) from (3):
(4x - 4x) + (6y - 6y) = 16 - 7
0 = 9 — a FALSE statement
Step 3A false statement with no variables means the lines are parallel — there is no point of intersection.
Answer
No solution — the system is inconsistent (parallel lines).
Step 1Let ten's digit =
x, unit's digit =
y. Original number =
10x + y. Reversed =
10y + x.
Condition 1: x + y = 9 ... (1)
Condition 2: 9(10x + y) = 2(10y + x)
90x + 9y = 20y + 2x
88x - 11y = 0
8x - y = 0 ... (2)
Step 2Add (1) and (2) — y cancels:
(x + y) + (8x - y) = 9 + 0
9x = 9 → x = 1
Step 3Substitute x=1 into (1): 1 + y = 9 → y = 8
Answer
The number is 18. Check: 9 × 18 = 162 = 2 × 81 ✓
Step 1Let incomes =
9x and
7x; expenditures =
4y and
3y. Income − Expenditure = Savings:
9x - 4y = 2000 ... (1)
7x - 3y = 2000 ... (2)
Step 2Multiply (1) by 3 and (2) by 4 to equate y-coefficients:
27x - 12y = 6000 ... (3)
28x - 12y = 8000 ... (4)
Step 3Subtract (3) from (4):
(28x - 27x) - (12y - 12y) = 8000 - 6000
x = 2000
Step 4Substitute x=2000 into (1): 9(2000) - 4y = 2000 → 4y = 16000 → y = 4000
Answer
Person A earns ₹ 18,000 (= 9×2000), Person B earns ₹ 14,000 (= 7×2000).
Step 1Let fixed charge =
x (₹), extra daily charge =
y (₹ per day). Extra days = total days − 3.
Saritha (7 days): x + (7-3)y = 27 → x + 4y = 27 ... (1)
Susy (5 days): x + (5-3)y = 21 → x + 2y = 21 ... (2)
Step 2The x-coefficients are already equal (both 1). Subtract (2) from (1):
(x + 4y) - (x + 2y) = 27 - 21
2y = 6 → y = 3
Step 3Substitute
y=3 into (2):
x + 2(3) = 21 → x + 6 = 21 → x = 15
Step 4Sense-check: Saritha: 15 + 4(3) = 15 + 12 = 27 ✓
Answer
Fixed charge = ₹ 15, Extra daily charge = ₹ 3.

Click any problem number to expand its full step-by-step solution. Difficulty increases from Foundational → Basic → Intermediate → Challenging within each section.